James Fetzer Episode 114
Episode 114: A New Pearl Harbor
Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality. A magna cum laude graduate of Princeton who majored in philosophy, he earned his Ph.D. in the history and philosophy of science. He has received many awards and forms of recognition for his teaching and scholarship.
in yet another phenomenal interview with James Fetzer, discussion goes through the A-Z of conspiracies. From JFK to The Moon. Jim is more than alive and firing on all cylinders. Jim becomes unhinged with truth, what does he think of alex jones and his ongoing lawsuits? Does he ever worry of litigation for all the material he has put out there on the incident. Jim has sent alex material and they have used it before and even published an article. However that has been since taken down and removed completely.
“A NEW PEARL HARBOR”
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor”. Section V of Rebuilding America’s Defenses, entitled “Creating Tomorrow’s Dominant Force”. “Forces and Resources for a New Century”, dated September, 2000. (Page 51)
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
PNAC members, and signees to its policy documents, include: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wofowitz, Jeb Bush, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Scooter Libby, Elliot Abrams, Richard Armitage, William Bennet, William Kristol, and Zalmy Khalilzad – men with their hands deep in the private defense, oil, and multi-national corporate industries poised to make vast sums of money and secure huge tracts of power and influence if PNAC policy evolved into U.S. Government policy. Nine months after they rose to power, and assumed central positions of leadership up and down the spectrum of military, civilian, domestic, and international agencies, they got their ‘New Pearl Harbor’. And PNAC policy essentially evolved into the Bush Administration’s official agenda. While this alarmingly convenient coincidence does not prove anything in and of itself, it does establish motive. And it certainly would raise the eyebrows of concern from any serious investigator looking into the facts of September 11.