Mike Rogers – THOSE PHOENIX LIGHTS CON FEROZ OJOS NUEVOS

THOSE PHOENIX LIGHTS
CON FEROZ OJOS NUEVOS

Now this changes everything! This actually proves the ominous first-
event object to be carried on the fast-moving overhead wind! A fact
of reality debunkers and UFO gurus have failed in alerting public eyes!

by
M H Rogers

A great mystery yet unfolds,
Attests of the many shout so bold.
Ethereal trains blow by in vain,
Such tearful touching oaths of old.

Download the article in it’s entirety. 

 

On a relatively pleasant winter’s eve, that of Thursday, March 13th, 1997, long about twilight an astounding phenomenon was about to take flight. An enormous dark object an unbelievable third of a mile across, strangely lighted on its leading edges, easily glided across Arizona from north to south; a fantastic awe-filled aerial parade of electric excitement throughout the state; observed from Southern Nevada as well, and a national scrambling in DC as a ‘Def-Com 3’ was called. Yes, the most widely witnessed mass-sighting in all of normal and paranormal history: “THE PHOENIX LIGHTS”.
In all reality, this actually did happen; to every degree as awesome and provocative as the great many would come to tell. They say a host of 10,000 caught the show. I know of this historic event first hand, as I was among the many, a witness to the Lights as well.

Most people have only known me as the foreman of the “Fire in the Sky” crew. It’s not that my account of the Lights is all that different from thousands of consonant others. It’s what I have to impart otherwise that will make all the difference to history. This comes 21 years later.
I’m sure by now you’ve heard of many attempted explanations of the eternal-seeming mystery, with all to the present in most discerns, being problematic and ultimately confusing.

It seems there is little to be found in the endless words of the supposedly wise that are anything other than preconceived, offsetting differences of opinion. The unbiased fragment that does remain…wait—not really sure there are any? It should lead one to question why the need for so much insistence on prejudice; so flauntingly lacking in objectivity?
The Bias Equation: 160IQ X BIAS = IQ106. Simple math.

Why didn’t I speak up sooner, like twenty-one years ago?
Because back then I was dedicated and fully involved in defending the truth of our 1975 encounter against all foes, and there were many. Our movie, “Fire in the Sky”, had premiered number-one four exact years earlier, and a month prior to that we’d passed the ultimate in polygraph proofs, yet again, from an examiner in contention as the best in the world. Our newest book was coming out. As you can well imagine, the debunkers seemed more trained on our destruction than ever before.

It didn’t matter a whit to them that nary an item of nonfictional fault had ever been found; they just continued to fabricate old supposed flaws out of feverish whole-cloth desperation. Such were presented when we faced off with Mr. Naysayer himself, the late and not so great, Philip Klass, on “Larry King Live” and exposed debunking for what it was.
Even while observing the prodigious display, I realized I could not speak a word, lest pseudo-debunkers would make the most of what they’d pound into all-new allegations of 44 caliber.
I laid back every night cushioning my conscience, believing my words too presumptuous to even say. The truth would surely come about somehow, just any day? But for every day of every year since, I’ve had a gnawing premonition it would all eventually revert to me.

Then, not being able to stomach the noxious, aggrandized, evolutions of spiel on its 20th anniversary, I knew the time was near. I’d yet bring the forborne to questioning eyes still waiting, but when comes the day? Well…Katy bar the door, that day is here.We tucked the loud skeptics in their soft little one-sided beds much earlier; good kids I guess, I just got tired of screaming lullabies. Besides, there are plenty of others to hush the harsh tune of debunking lyres. It is another bold tune of which I now sing, and it’s title again is “The Truth”.
So what is this still half-secret revelation…specifically?

It begins with an anomaly of mid-troposphic WIND; that of March 13, 1997. Specifically winds from the lower to higher elevations in which the famed object of the first-event flew.

The extraordinary mid-tropospheric wind affecting the occurrence is a phenomenon that in some ways rivals the event itself, but was officially ascertained in great detail by the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as aided by their many independent weather stations across Arizona and the nation. From 4 am (MST), 3-13-’97, on through to 3-14-’97, herein displayed are only a few of the still existing NWS and NOAA documents exhibited for official confirmation.

I observed the spectacular Phoenix Lights object from a hilltop near Prescott, Arizona, while trying to get video of the Hale-Bopp comet. In waning twilight, wind way up there won’t indicate direction unless something distinct is suspended within? My first amazed gaze that crisp winter evening, from my abundantly clear-skied mountainous vista, must have been more crystal than most? I could see details few others have told, and my first clues to the control of the wind. I intently pondered what I was experiencing until it was almost gone from sight. The backward breeze then delivered an eerie telling chill to the back of my neck…and I bolted.
Understanding the wind is paramount to awareness, and those who always condescend to enlighten us: debunkers of the most high, never said a word of the wind. Excuse me; is ‘wind’ a new four-letter word? By now you’d think so.

The mid-pm winds in-between the relative lulls of Arizona’s windiest month are considerably stronger, but this was an anomalous wind event. As displayed here again (below), you may have noticed something else quite strange about this chart? My interpretation is part speculation, but the shaded areas on the chart show a fugacious split in the stream that left a suspiciously large, almost dead-air space the size of four southwestern states in-between.

Besides creating an unusual mid-tropospheric southerly flow building up in Arizona, this split looks amazingly like a huge induced airfoil. It was causing wind to move much faster around its longer side, trying to catch up with wind and its pressure at the rejoining end. And whether manipulated or not, it functioned that way, though too simply stated, and part speculation.
By one am the next morning the airfoil-like area had moved further east and was dissipating. But for well over an hour the Phoenix Lights object moved in lockstep with the altering directions, drastically changing elevations and various speeds of the southerly wind.

The gigantic mass was borne on the wind; that should have been shouted to the public long before now; hell, the very next day!
However, extreme prejudices on both sides don’t want their unctuous bubble popped. UFO gurus have always pulled-wool to keep their flocks from running away. And one of the newest debunkers, Tony Ortega, never mentioned wind in his Klassically erroneous stint. Although he updated in 2008, it hasn‘t changed in the least bit since.This data and more has always been here for those of ambition to take a chance, but the self-appointed gurus and vain debunkers have both ignored contrary vital facts quicker than the backwards glance, and seem to want all eyes as ignorant too.

The data below is from NOAA, and gives us wind directions recorded in the weather stations of Central Arizona. The overhead wind was more consistent; hardly as slowed or effected by the interspersed mountain ridges. But this span of surface data does corroborate the wind’s direction at the lower of the first-event object’s elevations, and establishes the fact that during the time of the first event the surface flow in Central Arizona was wavering out of the northwest-by-north. East is .090º. South is .180º. West is .270º. North is .360º. All reported data is equally considered within that period without biased preference. The four recorded wind directions within the prime first-event period were: northeast-by-north, due west, north-northwest, and northwest-by-west. Averaging comes to wind out of the northwest-by-north, or .330º scant.

This is the same average direction of the higher object-level wind from just above Prescott to beyond Casa Grande. As verified by pilots and others, its elevations were from 15,000 feet (ASL) crossing the mountains, down to 9,000 feet (10,300 ASL) over Phoenix, and under 5,600 feet (7,000 ASL), just before ‘lights-out’ near Casa Grande. It zipped over the mountains between 60 and 80 mph, a bit slower over Phoenix, and slower still before disappearing near Casa Grande.

Some perceived the Lights from as much as 160 miles away, but testified it rocketed right past them. Others perceived from 70 miles away, but swore it floated right over their heads.
The given explanation of Tony Ortega, is that the first-event object was a formation of airplanes, flying at very high altitude. The peoples’ UFO map specifically describes the core route of the object/s down across Arizona, and has been in public display since Peter Davenport posted it on the Net. It is a long existing word-of-the-people. In NO way does the map constitute proof or even evidence of visiting space entities. But it is a verified document of the mass-attestation of the core path of the ‘unidentified’ objects, including Tony‘s unidentified, presumed airplanes.
As well, Ortega has verified the core route of the witnesses’ objects within his debunking scenario; from just above Prescott to northwest Phoenix to South Phoenix to Casa Grande and beyond, though he was delineating the route of supposed airplanes.

So now we have this stunning result (below), when the high overhead, object-level wind of March 13, 1997, is superimposed right over the top of Tony’s and the witnesses’ precisely curving object/s path. As transposed, the fast moving wind is visually represented by large transparent blue arrows.
Two separate maps of two separate events, separately compiled, with neither knowing of the other. Yet now comes this intricate, near-perfect, actual fact of alignment. The odds of coincidence are realistically zero, and Tony’s virtual path-map also aligns.

Only our human inexactness; mine, Davenport’s, and the National Weather Service, is that which only seems to keep this partly hand-drawn, illustrated alignment from being perfect.
However, according to the natural laws of physics, this alignment is not merely close, and regardless of imperfect human abilities.The core path of the enormous object/s and of the wind have existed identical from the initial incident, as the intricate curving path of the wind was the very thing that created the intricate curving path of the object/s. Thus, this alignment is not merely close; these paths were and are identical.

To understand this to an ‘inarguable’ degree, go buy a party balloon filled with helium, take it somewhere safe and toss it to the wind. See…you will then have a physical demonstration that will inarguably have an identical path to the path of the wind. Just as immediately unveiled are those peripheral things on the peoples’ map that were: An exaggerated assumption (since USAF dispelled); a large but innocent group-misperception, and at least three of the hypothetical lines from nowhere. These flaws reciprocally obviated as well.

Who in their right mind would even attempt to refute the actual findings of the National Weather Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration? All their documents have publicly existed for the entire interim; tie in with all weather before and after, and solidly factual. And neither believer, debunker nor skeptic is going to refute the objects’ core path.
So what’s left to prevent recognition?…Prevalent IQ neutralizing bias, that’s what.

I introduced this revelation on the “Michael Decon Program” on September 2nd, 2018. In the weeks thereafter I received an avalanche of e-mail. To my surprise the majority of UFO believers were agreeable, but a few weren’t budging. ‘Eager believers’, as I call them, the ones Ortega calls ‘credulous’, want the ominous object to be piloted by ETs…period; vital facts be damned. And Mr. UFO himself, Peter Davenport, of the National UFO Reporting Center, feels the same. In several e-mails he skirted all around the principal subject. And although this sudden revelation coincides with his own past unwitting words as acknowledgment of the wind’s exact direction, along with his famous UFO path-map, he has spent 21 years proclaiming the Lights to be the best extraterrestrial evidence ever. The Lights’ first-event is definitely the greatest UFO happening in the whole history, so now Davenport apparently can’t manage anything but expectedly biased denial, but by proxy. Never did Davenport directly address the obvious inarguable facts, though essentially his own; just throwing empty cans from the cheap seats. (metaphorical humor)

Yet, within this same arena, skeptical-seeming debunkers are apparently in a strange state of agreement! They’ve never addressed the obvious either.

You would think that skeptics would use the most provable, protruding reality of the first-event, in showing us lowly believers how truly silly our thinking really is…or so you’d think. And you’d be right about ‘skeptics’, per se. However, ‘debunkers’ are a whole different breed with a completely different agenda. No kidding; I couldn’t be more serious.
I have spent the better part of my adult life always being hectored and endlessly insulted by those skeptical-seeming debunkers and my old antagonist, Phil Klass, and always studying their mindsets. In that time I’ve learned a few things.

First of all, there are two distinct kinds: Ordinary skeptics; disbelieving, but human otherwise. Some are my closest friends. These are the people who constitute what’s called the ‘skeptical community’, although there isn’t any such place, and they don’t all live there. A few prefer the ‘atheist community’ across the long bridges and down in the lower Klassy valley. Too warm for me, but they seem to like it there. The other skeptics aren’t really skeptics. Working titles for them when so employed: ‘Disinformation Specialist’; ‘Propagandist’, or their favorite, ‘Debunker’. Time was when they didn’t like being called debunkers, but they seem to be settling into it well. Now they even refer to their skill as ‘debunking’ themselves. Well…times change.

I have some idea how the debunkers will react to this revelation, and its inescapable meaning, if they respond at all? I only know their Klassic tactic is to stand pat.
Whether Pat wants to stand there or not, debunkers aren’t known to switch horses in the middle of peeing in a believable stream. They know horses won’t move anyway until they are finished. Horses know their debunking masters wouldn’t want them to suddenly move while they are still standing and unzipped. Wait—I remember how it goes: When standing on the backs of horses, debunkers aren’t known to switch streams in the middle of peeing on believers. Yeah, that’s it…more realistic. (virtual humor)

Debunkers boast to know practically everything, which gives them no flexibility at all, so they can‘t switch anything, and their horses would be the first to agree.
Debunkers knew the Lights object was borne on the wind, and they knew it from the very beginning. How could they not? It takes no tenacity at all to simply check the immediately available records. That’s what I did, and I’m just a lowly citizen.

This reality was so ridiculously protrusive, Tony could have been strolling down an obscure path in lower Egypt, making his way back down the creek, and tripped right over it. But dedicated, he would have given it the quick backwards glance and kept walking. (virtual analogy)Tony Ortega might be a regular person in more normal settings, even appearing intellectual at a high level. I wouldn’t know, I only know him from his debunking. But I must say, if one’s limited scope was only the apparent illogic, and the very real insult in his debunking piece, again, of 2008, one couldn’t help but see an open display of prepossession, predilection, and prejudicial preference, oozing with sticky bias from its every narrow corner. But…what his debunking truly is, start to finish, its every oozing bias included, is a damned excellent piece of Klassic disinformation. Unless one already knew the actual facts of the Phoenix Lights, Tony’s train would throw anyone off so thoroughly they wouldn’t know where they parked or if they even owned a vehicle. Grade “A”, Tony! (slight exaggeration)

His diversion had me sidetracked for hours, mulling over the blatancy of his dastardly bias, and I already knew the truth of the Lights. I can tell you this; the next time I find myself in real desperate need of knowing exactly what something isn’t, I’m going to read Tony’s latest, and I’ll have my keys taped to my wrist with clear instructions. (virtually serious)

Among other feign skews, he wrote that the structure between the Lights didn‘t exist. He said perception was due to contrast-effect and the credulity of the believers. The truth: nonhuman apparatuses also perceive this illusion. Are cameras credulous too? The odd thing is, this very same natural illusion is equally as capable of hiding semi-transparent or dark structure were it actually may exist. I was very close; I saw the dark but vivid structure, accentuated by the lighter sky behind. The unclouded night sky, even without the moon or twilight, is never pitch-black.

Now, how sure can we be that Tony’s ten-year-old witness didn’t perceive airplanes due to ‘contrast-effect’ and his own ‘credulous’ desire? After all, the kid could only say he thought they were airplanes back behind the lights, but couldn’t tell if they were fighter jets, huge 747s or little single-engine planes, not even through his quality 10-inch telescope. Uh-oooh…!
Ortega talked to a witness in Prescott who heard jet-like sounds. I was in Prescott myself. The witness did say jet-like sounds were heard. I said there was more than one who also heard the jet-like sounds of the wind, and it was coming from high overhead too, from the tall pinyons and pines and other overhead structures, prompting the wide eyes of confusion; story amended.
Ortega’s unidentified, presumed ‘V’ of jets at least contrasts with Peter Davenport’s insistent claim that reports of sizes up from a 747 (196 ft. wide), through to a whopping 8 miles (42,240 ft. wide), somehow proves its measured size of one-third mile to be the only apparent error. Really? And so we should assume, as did he, that whole extreme span of guesstimates to all have been precisely spot-on? Well then, being as all those ‘humans’ were all so precisely accurate, that could only mean the entire sky was crowded with drastically differing giant black triangles? I needn’t ask; Davenport‘s UFO path-map actually shows that to be his immensely desired take.

Shall we also talk about IQ neutralizing, face-value assumption? OK, let’s: Except for a 2% cut of very certifiable witnesses, there are NO other reports within the multitudes of anyone observing more than ONE gigantic object at the same time. Yet there were crowds of drastically differing witnesses who all observed the ONE object at the same time. What? It is self-evident: Only ONE enormous object of ONE actual size. Aside from the expected wide spread of ‘inherent’ human errors, the only apparent, lasting errors were Davenport’s face-value assumptions.As well, there is NO verification of the object/s flying across Southern Nevada to Northern Arizona, except for the Nevada perceptions themselves. The laws of physics dictate ‘perception’ to only be of mind. Perception and subsequent ‘conception’ have no real physical existence. Perception is only an indication of reality; it exists but ambiguous within the mind.

Absolutely no one in the bustling outdoor throngs of Vegas observed the super-conspicuous, gigantic lighted object flying overhead, nor anyone else in the entire state; just that tiny tight handful of Bolder City, Henderson area witnesses who each perceived it streaking away toward the southeast at “low altitude”. The natural illusion I have coined as: ‘virtual perception’, very comprehensively explains these considerably distant illusory observations, but does start the time in Northern Arizona about 7:55 pm. My close observation began somewhere around 8:05 pm. Yes, I checked, but admittedly, I had no radio controlled precision with me at the time.
Ortega’s bogus duration time of 30 minutes was deliberate, just to distract from the fact of the ‘parallel wind’; the one thing he truly didn’t want known.

To have acknowledged the wind would have ‘blown’ the entire purpose of his debunking. The close-approximate duration time, from Prescott to Casa Grande, was somewhere over an hour. Besides, the laws of physics once again dictates the physical fact of the parallel wind as physically exacting the fact that the famous object/s made the wind-borne witnessed trip in precisely the time it actually took, and regardless of the various ‘opinions’ of duration time, or Tony’s up-until-now diversion.Those gosh-darned laws of physics, huh? A debunker can‘t get a decent break!

However, Ortega’s open display of flagrant preference, prejudicially discarding even the best believable accounts of the thousands with a single wave of his brandishing bias, turn right around and flauntingly prefer the one witness available with a demonstrably different concept…well, that was simply masterful. That has kept the beliefs of believers in the status quo; not one with a hint of anything but that Tony’s explanation is a still-steaming pile.

If you think about it, not once has the lofty words of debunkers ever changed the mind of believers about anything? Believers aren‘t so credulous. Surprise; us lowly believers know mathematics too. When the odds are a thousand to one, the odds get the win, my unfeigned friends. Would Tony board a jet if the odds of survival were even as good as his 50-50?
Oh, he would?…Well I guess that explains it? (virtual humor)
Phil Klass was a Disinformation Specialist; I know—I was there. As well, we’ve since obtained a wealth of positive evidence of his clandestine government affiliations, closing on actual proof.

What debunking explanations have done, as to the present and past intent of debunking, is kept the semi-credulous skeptical community singing their praises, and believers believing. Well that’s all fine and good for debunkers, and maybe their actual purpose might be of noble intent to providing a comparatively costless conventional deterrent and magnanimously saved the lives of countless would-be aggressors, and even a few defenders? But no matter how well intended or seemingly working, falsehood is never a good idea. Such long-term prevarication programs have a most uncanny way of eventually coming apart at the ‘seems’. Personally, I believe aggressors are totally responsible for their own suicidal demise. It’s not our job to protect our enemies, no matter how much is saved, especially with distortions to American citizens.

This writing is considerably condensed. There exists many more charts, maps, graphs, data and illustrations, as well as extensive realities of the whole Lights once-was mystery.
I am a genuine believer, but also a realist. Believers are the more happy and adventurous, but sometimes a bit too vivacious. What provably is most definitely is, and what isn’t…just ain’t.
Both believers and UFO gurus need to understand that this revelation doesn’t change a single witnesses’ perception of the first-event object.

Observers certainly perceived what they perceived. All this does is challenge the concept of extraterrestrial origin. This only reveals the actual fact that the awesome object was borne on the wind. Anything beyond that is admittedly speculation. But there’s a whole lot that can be reasonably speculated through the mathematical deductive logic of calculus. Digital leaves miniscule room for preconception. “Wrong don’t work.” (quote from Travis Walton)
Regardless, whatever happened to awareness of good old-fashioned reality? You know…that too often forgotten thing that will kill you dead, fast or slow, should you ever loose track? Well, it’s still here, always hiding in plain sight, and it’s even more lethal than before.

It might be wise not to ignore it. Don’t let yourself be IQ neutralized by biased thinking.
Sorry about stepping on toes, Tony, but with respect, I must tell the foot-stomping truth.
Peter; the UFO community needs you…IQ unbiased.
Laughter is OK though, always uplifting; virtually harmless.
Virtual humor: Something so close to being true it’s close to being funny, but not really true and not really funny. Virtual laughter, on the other hand, is a ‘facial contortion’ so close to their perception of hilariousness…it’s not even funny.